Friday, February 2, 2007

Vertrue Buys Neverblue

from Adotas

Internet marketing company Vertrue Inc. has purchased Canadian rival Neverblue Media, a performance marketing company that focuses on lead generation and client acquisition.

“Neverblue Media brings with them a specialized knowledge of the online marketplace and will be an integral part of bringing Vertrue into new areas of the Internet,” said Vertrue CEO Gary Johnson in a statement. Neverblue employs 50 in British Columbia, and its business is divided into 5 units. Services include affiliate marketing, marketing through online properties, SEM and co-registration marketing. Neverblue will keep its offices and staff, and operate as a Virture subsidiary.

Vertrue owns two other Canadian businesses including the online dating service, Lavalife Inc.

Last week, after announcing Vertrue’s 12% revenue increase for the fourth quarter of 2006, Johnson cited his company’s “commitment to expanding our Internet presence and strong business execution.” Along with Neverblue, Vertrue has also acquired Neverblue spinoff PhoneInterviewed.com, a company that generates leads though direct telephone contact.

What Works, and What Doesn't, in Online Marketing

FEBRUARY 2, 2007

What is the word from the trenches?
In an end-of-the-year survey, ad:tech and MarketingSherpa asked online marketers what marketing tactics worked for them in 2006 and what they expected to concentrate their time and spending on in the months ahead.

Here is what the online marketers said:
First off, and keeping in mind that the sample consisted of the early-adopter ad:tech audience — not the whole marketing world — so responses were skewed accordingly, the marketers expect overall online spending to rise slightly from 47% of the budget in 2006 to 49% in 2007.

Not much change for a group that has largely already adopted online advertising techniques and strategies.

When the marketers were asked what worked best — and worst — the results were clearer. Search engine optimization (SEM) showed the biggest jump in 2006, while pop-up ads had the largest decline in favor.

In addition, marketers like house e-mail lists, but started shying away from rented e-mail lists.

Those findings were reflected in the answers to the question "Where's the money going in 2007?" Search marketing and e-mail marketing to house lists are in the lead for this year, while e-mailing to third-party lists is only going to be used by 13% of the respondents.

As to new online marketing tactics that marketers are considering, blog, social network and video ads lead the way as emerging tactics in 2007.

For more information on one of the most anticipated new online marketing options, take a look at eMarketer's new Internet Video: Advertising Experiments and Exploding Content report.

Thursday, February 1, 2007

Greed Generation

by Josh Lovison, Thursday, February 1, 2007

PEOPLE ARE greedy. Oh sure, sometimes we break from the mold and have our altruistic moments, but at the core of our being, we love to receive. This shouldn't come as a shock to anyone reading this -- many advertising models are built on this premise: by submitting themselves to advertising, consumers can get things for free.

However, there's been an oft-repeated phrase going on in advertising and marketing these days: "Give the consumers control." But I think that's obfuscating the reality: regardless of what you as an advertiser or marketer choose to do, consumers are taking control. And in the spirit of greed, you can expect Web 3.0 to be adding an additional twist.

Revenue sharing. Learn those two words well. With the boom of user-generated content, most users were just happy to get a voice. However, the industry of UGC is maturing, and enough competition between venues has arisen that a new factor has been thrown into the mix: revenue-split models. Right now we're seeing it primarily with video hosting sites. First there was Revver, with a 50% advertising split for post-roll ads. Brightcove is just starting to roll out the same model, with possibilities for expanded ad space. Panjea is a social network trying to implement revenue sharing. A number of bloggers take things into their own hands and put Google AdSense onto their blogs. I've also seen some forums tie their users' AdSense accounts into the system to share revenue, depending on who created the post. And just this week, we had the big news that online video industry leader YouTube is jumping on the revenue-sharing train as well.

In the past things haven't really taken off with revenue sharing because it's new, and until recently, most services trying it offered little in terms of service. Which is a nice way of saying they weren't very good. However, I return to the original tenet of this article: people are greedy, and even if it's only $20 a month, between two nearly equal services, people will choose the one offering the kickback.

And we should love them for it. There are three things revenue sharing could do for the media and advertising industry if we'd just let it:

1. Reverse bidding. The problem with current revenue-sharing models is that there's not enough targeted ad inventory for sites that appeal to multiple demographics. What inventory exists tends to focus on a single demographic, which decreases both the site and content producer's revenue when the content appeals outside that demographic due to decreased ad relevancy. But most content creators, no mater how amateur, know what their audience likes, both in terms of content and advertising. I'd love to see a content site allow users to select which ads of their hosting platform's inventory to include in content. Users could choose these based on the product's or the ad creative's appeal to their audience. For performance based marketing, this helps both the publisher/content creator and the advertiser by increasing relevancy. And as an added bonus for advertisers (and the reason I used the term "bidding"), the more your ad would be requested, the lower your CPC rates (because your ad would be bringing value to the site by performing well). This model doesn't yet exist, but it should.

2. Mainstream acceptance of behavioral targeting. Right now most consumers curl up their faces when discussing BT, as if you'd been offering them last week's casserole leftovers. "Companies tracking my data? No thanks!" And admittedly, it does sound a bit Orwellian. However, most of this displeasure is at the concept, not at the reality of the implementation. If incorporating BT into the ad selection for their own content was an option, users could see how allowing BT increases click-through on ads served for their content. And users aren't stupid, just uninformed. They will realize that higher click-through is resulting from increased relevancy. And in approving the option, the system should teach them how it works (anonymous cookies). Increasing their understanding of the process will increase their acceptance for the use of cookies in their own surfing.

3. Reframing of advertising in general. Involving users in the process of advertising, while on a rudimentary scale, will refocus and rebrand ads to those users. Today, if you are a marketer and you truly believe online ads are welcomed by Web surfers, you have a serious case of denial. Users don't like ads in the majority of cases (sometimes great creative wins them over, but that's less often.). Users see online ads as interruptive and cluttering-and, in most cases, don't notice them at all due to overexposure. Personally, I think I've only clicked on a handful of display ads in the past 10 years. The one exception was when I signed up to revenue sharing platforms. Ads were no longer clutter, they were what was putting money in my pocket, and more important, in the pockets of fellow content posters. If I enjoyed a video from a revenue-sharing site, I'd watch the post-roll ad out of respect for my fellow content creator. Ads went from a negative concept to, well, a less negative concept.

Revenue sharing will expand around the Web. All the dominos are lined up for this change and some are starting to fall. Because like it or not, consumers are taking control. And if you can't beat them, you can at least let them join you -- and don't worry, they will. Because they're greedy.

Surfers use tagging to make sense of the online sprawl - Blogs & Content - BizReport

Tagging is rising in popularity, and so are websites where it is enabled.
by Helen Leggatt
A report by the Pew Internet & American Life Project found that 28% of web users are organizing their information using tagging. According to Wikipedia a tag is 'a (relevant) keyword or term associated with or assigned to a piece of information (like picture, article, or video clip), thus describing the item and enabling keyword-based classification of information it is applied to.”
Tagging is used to organize photos on Yahoo, Flickr, del.icio.us and YouTube.

It has both an organizational function, and a social one. Being able to mark, store and retrieve content using personalized keywords and descriptions enables users to form their own search terms, and by finding similar tags they can find communities or individuals who hold similar interests and content.

So who is tagging? Pew found that they are likely to be well paid, educated, early adopters, under the age of 40.

A .pdf of the report can be found here."

What Agencies Should Know About Lead Generation

Agency Media Strategies
By Hollis Thomases | January 30, 2007

When I attended ad:tech New York a few months ago, I was struck by the number of exhibitors offering lead-generation buys. Perhaps I shouldn't have been so surprised. The Interactive Advertising Bureau (IAB) lists online lead generation as the fastest growing category in online ad spending. Where there's money to be made, new businesses shall follow. But online lead gen still struggles with reputation, education, and validation issues that make it the perfect topic for me to review.

Lead-Gen Landscape
Most lead-gen players agree that several factors are influencing the industry's maturity: lead quality, inventory and reach, and client expectation and experience. Matt Wise, president and CEO of Q Interactive, points out his company still has to sell lead gen into agencies as opposed to fielding requests from them. "There's a lack of mindshare when it comes to agencies and lead gen." Advertisers already participating in lead gen include pharmaceuticals, higher education, and financial services, but lead-gen companies are also seeing more traditional brand advertisers, like consumer packaged goods (CPG) and retailers testing the waters.

Why Such Rapid Growth?
Lead generation minimizes an advertiser's risk while developing a means by which the advertisers can remarket to known consumers. Effective lead gen provides accountability, controls costs, and generates measurable ROI (define), all things advertisers want. Jere Doyle, president and CEO of Prospectiv, believes "consumers embrace lead gen because it puts them more in control of how or to what they're being marketed." To even complete a form, the consumer has to be engaged and interested enough to alert the marketer that she wants more information. What advertiser wouldn't want that primed pump?

Agency Lead-Gen Strategy
Agencies must first become educated about lead gen. Learn best practices; what questions to ask when qualifying a vendor and how to protect the advertiser's acquired data; how to best represent the brand and generate a quality lead, and to create a solid plan to use the lead once it's acquired.

Questions to ask when qualifying a vendor include:
Is the lead acquired through clear, conspicuous consumer consent?
Does the consumer think she's signing up for a single inquiry or offer when in fact her data will be shared with other third parties?
If the consumer's data is resold, is that clearly stated?
Are consumers offered an incentive to sign up for the lead?
Is there at least double opt-in permission given by the consumer?
Who owns the consumer's data?
How is the data validated?
Have you worked with any clients similar to ours?
What kinds of targeting options are there?
What kind of feedback loop exists?
What happens if fraudulent leads are provided?
What kind of reporting or data-transfer options exist?
Does the provider have a skilled creative staff and statistician in-house?
So as not to frustrate the user and discourage the lead, Michael Weinsoff, president and CEO of Internet Advertising Group, advises seeking a proper balance between posing too many questions and qualifying a lead.

Common Confusions, Misconceptions, and Pitfalls
A common point of confusion lies in the differentiation between lead gen and co-registration. To some, co-reg means signing up for multiple offers at one time, perhaps with just an e-mail address, rather than giving consent for one offer at a time by answering a few qualifying questions. To others, lead gen merely involves filling out a form with specific questions.

Misconceptions abound: Lead gen equals low-quality marketing. Lead gen is only for direct response marketers. You can't get granularity or predictability with lead gen.

Q Interactive finds the converse true: of its top 100 advertisers in 2006, it had 100 percent renewal. In fact, says Wise, "once an advertiser gets in on lead gen, they don't want to talk about it because they don't want their competitors to know."

Avoid the pitfall of expecting all leads to convert; a poor follow-up plan or slow reaction by sales teams can lead to unsuccessful campaigns.

Untapped Opportunities
Most everyone believes business-to-business (B2B) lead gen has yet to gain momentum. Allan Levy, president and CEO of SilverCarrot, is just waiting for demand to pick up. Prospectiv's Doyle says, "There is a lot of talk about the international market [and] lead gen on a local level."

Lead gen has great potential to be part of the media mix, but agencies must develop specific lead-gen strategy and not try to wedge it into a typical display-oriented buy.

Google's Brand New Appeal

Advertisers are finding more reasons to place ads on the Web-search leader; now they're using it to promote their brands

by Robert Hof

Are Google investors getting spoiled? Even though Google (GOOG) managed to blow away fourth-quarter earnings on Jan. 31, its shares fell by about 1% in extended trading. The sellers may have missed the real import of the search giant's report: More than ever, it's got the entire advertising world in its sights. And this year, Google will come out with guns blazing.

Investors, who had boosted the stock 1.5% before the report, may have hoped for a little stronger revenue growth vs. the third quarter than the 20% Google reported. "Expectations got ahead of themselves," says Scott Devitt, an analyst with Stifel, Nicolaus. But mostly, some investors decided to pocket some profits following a 10% rise in the stock so far this year.
A New Light

And Google had profits to spare. It earned $1.03 billion, nearly triple a year ago, on a 67% jump in revenues, to $3.2 billion. This was the ninth of 10 quarters as a public company that Google, which now accounts for about a quarter of all online advertising, outperformed expectations.

The big drivers this quarter: strong growth in traffic thanks to holiday shopping and improvement in the effectiveness of ads placed alongside Google's search results. In fact, according to Chief Executive Eric Schmidt, Google is showing fewer ads per search on average but is making more money because it's more carefully targeting ads to the most commercial sites. "The targeting and the technical work that we are doing is producing better return for advertisers, better revenue for us, with even fewer advertisements," he told analysts during a conference call.

Perhaps most interesting for Google's future, it's now apparent that advertisers are viewing search—and Google—in a new light. Up to this point, search ads have been almost solely considered a direct-response medium, where advertisers can measure how many people they reached by tracking the number of clicks and subsequent purchases or other activity.
Aiming Big

Now, many advertisers are starting to use search ads for branding, like more traditional ads. That means companies will place ads through Google to send a message or promote a product generally, and not necessarily to get customers to take an immediate action, such as going to the Web site or purchasing an item online. "Our advertisers are now placing more brand advertising," Sergey Brin, Google co-founder and president of technology, said in the analyst call. And it appears to be working, says John Aiken, managing director at Majestic Research. "They're benefiting from people searching online and purchasing offline," he says.

The trend among brick-and-mortar retailers and even consumer-packaged-goods giants to use Google search ads for branding has made search ads more expensive for small advertisers (see BusinessWeek.com, 1/22/07, "The Small Fry Sour on Search Ads"). But it's a boon for Google. And ad agencies confirm that it's starting to take off. "Search can be a very good branding tool," says Jason Schulman, chief revenue officer for X+1, which helps companies refine their online marketing efforts.

Indeed, Google executives signaled in the clearest way yet their expansive intentions: The company aims to offer a "complete sales and marketing platform for all advertisers," Brin said. "We're talking to advertisers about using Google for all kinds of advertising," added Schmidt. For instance, Volvo, Procter & Gamble (PG), and OfficeMax (OMX) all placed image and video ads on Google's networks.

Ad Capture

Google is rapidly adding new places to advertise as well, with more to come this year. It bought the video phenom YouTube last October, and it has done deals with radio stations and newspaper groups to handle local ads. "Anything Google's selling, we're buying for clients," says Bill Wise, CEO of Did-It Search Marketing.

Schmidt even implied that television advertising was ripe for Google to handle. He said Google's targeting technology can "really apply well" to TV, and allow television stations to charge much higher rates for that targeting. He said there was an opportunity for Google to use data from TV set-top boxes, which have unique Internet addresses, to do that targeting.

Beyond its evident expansion into new territory, Google also simply continues to outmaneuver competitors such as Yahoo! (YHOO) and Microsoft (MSFT)—on both search and accompanying ads. Despite those two companies' efforts to catch up—Yahoo with Project Panama, a new search ad ranking system that starts rolling out in February—Google is expected to capture two-thirds of the search ad market this year, according to the e-business research firm eMarketer. "When a company starts advertising, it tends to go one place, and that's Google," says John Aiken, managing director at Majestic Research.
Spending Spree

Google's fourth-quarter results raised a couple of concerns, though none major. The company's so-called traffic acquisition costs, or TAC, which it pays to partners, looks to rise this year. That's because Google will have to pay more to recent partners such as eBay (EBAY) and News Corp.'s (NWS) MySpace, as well as new partners, as it moves further into radio and video advertising. "We may see additional pressure on TAC rates," said Chief Financial Officer George Reyes.

Google also spent heavily on some new initiatives. Google Checkout, its payment system, ran widespread promotions, offering consumers up to $20 off purchases to try it out and giving sites using it a price break on Google ads. The company said that this helped it get a quarter of the Web's top retailers to use it. Moreover, they found that Google Checkout logos prompted more people to click through on ads, benefiting those merchants. But Reyes said the promotions essentially cost the company 1 percentage point in revenue growth.

And Google's capital spending continued at a fast pace. It totaled $367 million in the quarter and $1.9 billion in 2006, mostly on data centers, servers, and networking gear. The company said it expects to continue making "significant" capital expenditures this year. Moreover, the company hired nearly 1,300 people in the fourth quarter alone, up 14%, and analysts expect that growth to continue.

Ultimately, analysts also want to see Google diversify its revenue stream, which remains 99% advertising. In coming weeks, for instance, Google is expected to introduce a paid version of its corporate office-productivity services, called Google Apps for Your Domain. But such initiatives will take a while to develop. For the time being, though, Google's opportunities appear to outweigh its challenges.

Hof is BusinessWeek's Silicon Valley bureau chief.

Click Fraud Reportedly Up


FEBRUARY 1, 2007

Click, click, click, click, click, click, click, click, click, click, click, click....

Major search engine sites do not want to hear about it, but new data from Click Forensics indicate that click fraud threat levels to online advertising campaigns running on search engine content networks are not only continuing, but also rising.

Fourth-quarter numbers from the Click Fraud Index show that the overall industry average click fraud rate was 14.2%, compared with 13.8% for the third quarter, 14.1% for the second and 13.7% for the first.

That averages nearly 14% for the year.

"The most interesting data points from last quarter's data was that the industry average click fraud rate climbed to its highest level in 2006, said Tom Cuthbert, CEO of Click Forensics.

He added, "The click fraud rate for affiliate sites was significantly higher than the overall industry average."

The average click fraud rate of pay-per-click (PPC) ads on search engine networks was 19.2% for the fourth quarter of 2007. At the same time, the average PPC term cost for the top key terms across the five largest search advertising industry categories was $3.50, an average that fell steadily from a first-quarter high of $4.75.

The industry average click fraud rate for high-priced search terms — defined as terms that cost over $2.00 — remained slightly higher than 20% through the latter part of the year. That is important to note because high-priced terms often make up the majority of an advertiser's total spend.

For more on this subject, read eMarketer's Search Engine Marketing: Players and Problems report.